The United Kingdom is in financial
trouble. As a country we are spending more than we earn. Our
government has to borrow money to be able to provide basic services.
If your monthly income is £1,500 yet you spend on average £2,000 a
month you will very soon get into serious financial trouble.
The old financial tools deployed by the
UK Government to deal with this situation just do not work in the
current global environment. They may try to stimulate the economy by
reducing the bank interest rate. The idea being that lower interest
rates encourage people to borrow more money and spend that on
manufactured goods, thus promoting growth. The problem is that
interest rates are already at a record low level and the real
interest rates charged to the public remain stubbornly high. As the
banks try to recover from the losses of their previous toxic debt
(casino banking) scandal and also raise their reserves they have no
incentive to reduce interest rates charged to customers. The other
problem with stimulating growth through low interest rates is that
people use the borrowed money to buy imported goods thus worsening
the country's debt position.
The lower interest rates also
discourages frugal people with spare money from long term savings.
The is little point in saving if the actual deposit interest rate is
lower than the rate of inflation. People see their savings better
protected by investing in property. This gives no net gain in the
national wealth and sees money sucked away from investment in UK
industry. The Catch 22 with "investment" in property is that it only works by forcing up property prices. People borrow more money to pay these increased property prices, when there is an increase in the interest rate it will suck a massive amount of spending money from the economy to pay banks. In 1989 the base bank interest rate rose to 15%.
Another Government tactic is to print
extra money. This is not money that has been earned or borrowed, it is
merely a devaluation of the national currency. In effect it is
debasement of the coinage or clipping silver from the coins. It is a
technique usage for centuries when the rulers do not have enough
income to meet expenditure. The current fashionable name for this is
Quantitative Easing. The problem is that this reduces the value of
the money held, in our Sterling currency, by overseas banks and
investors. It is in effect a back door devaluation against other
currencies. The problem is that devaluation increases the price of
goods imported into this country. As we spend more on imports than we
earn by exporting the effect is that we further increase the
indebtedness of the UK by printing money. If anyone doubts the impact of a currency collapse look at the example of Argentina. Currency devaluation tends to increase interest rates as oversea depositors look to maintain the return on their loans to this country.
Over the past couple of decades
businesses based in the UK have tried to reduce their operating costs
by moving their production processes overseas. While this may reduce
the monetary cost of the product it increases the amount of goods
that we import. Moving production overseas also removes paid
employment from UK employees. It means those ex-employees (and the
companies on their behalf) no longer contribute to UK employment and
national insurance taxation. Unless that employee can find another
job he/she becomes a burden on the UK Government in terms of social
benefit payments and reduced tax contribution. It also means that the
individual surviving on social benefits is less likely to contribute
to the UK economy by purchasing UK manufactured goods. The last
Labour Government expanded the size of national and local government
to create jobs, but this increases the national borrowing requirement
to pay for the additional Government direct employees and outsourced
employees.
At the end of the twentieth century the
UK economy was bolstered by additional income from North Sea oil and
gas, but that additional income source is rapidly diminishing. The
United Kingdom needs to take some serious steps to rebalance its
economy. We need to start earning a lot more than we spend. We have
some massive debts to pay off. We cannot use the old tactic of
inflation and devaluation, that would just increase the repayments on
our existing massive debt.
We need to make imported goods less
attractive to the UK population while at the same time make UK
manufactured goods much more attractive. This would help to rebuild
the UK manufacturing base as businesses are encouraged to produce
locally. This can be achieved by applying a minimum 30% tax on any
imported goods, food stuff, fuel, service, raw materials to this
country. An import tax on food would also encourage farmers in this country to produce more food from their land, thus improving our food security. At present our food supply chain breaks down very quickly if imports are disrupted for any reason. With the prospects of global food prices increasing we need to encourage our farmers to produce more homegrown food.
To compensate for the increased price of goods in the shops we should at the same time alter the income tax bands so that the ordinary 95% of the population pay no income tax. There could still be taxation of the wealthy. Suitable balancing of the tax rates would mean there is effectively the same same life quality for the UK population, but just that there is a greater incentive to buy locally produced goods and less incentive to use imported goods. That would boost the incentive for businesses to manufacture in the UK thus improving the employment of people within the UK. As the employment situation improves the reducing demand on social benefits will follow, reducing the demands on the public purse.
To compensate for the increased price of goods in the shops we should at the same time alter the income tax bands so that the ordinary 95% of the population pay no income tax. There could still be taxation of the wealthy. Suitable balancing of the tax rates would mean there is effectively the same same life quality for the UK population, but just that there is a greater incentive to buy locally produced goods and less incentive to use imported goods. That would boost the incentive for businesses to manufacture in the UK thus improving the employment of people within the UK. As the employment situation improves the reducing demand on social benefits will follow, reducing the demands on the public purse.
No doubt many of the current
politicians and economists will argue that using import taxes is a
bad thing. However, those people have had their chance and failed.
Their theories, maxims and economic models no longer work. It is time
for a new direction. We should shrug off the colonial guilt of trying
to stimulate the economies of overseas countries. They've had their
start-up, we now need to look after ourselves and prevent an economic
hangover for our children.
No comments:
Post a Comment